Evaluation Question 7;Looking back at your preliminary task, What do you feel you have learned in the progression from it to the product ?

Looking back at your preliminary task, What do you feel you have learned in the progression from it to the product ?

Our preliminary task and final product have some similar and some different elements. For example in our final product we reduced dialogue to a minimum because of the preliminary task where in didn't work too well. In the preliminary task the dialogue scenes needed re-filming several times and the dialogue was strangled and didn't sound natural. But we did adopt the long shots of the character walking from our preliminary task into our final product. We did this because we liked the creation of suspense but we did develop on it with the titles between shots to break it up which worked well. 

Shots

 The shots in our final product were a lot steadier than in our  preliminary task. The tilt in our preliminary task (1:58) was shaky and not very smooth. 





We can compare it to with the pan (0:53) or zoom (0:12) in the final product where the camera was very smooth and controlled giving a better effect than that in our preliminary task.

Image
We did change our ways from the preliminary task to the final product. In the preliminary task we did not think about lighting and we didn't pay enough attention to what was in the frame. The lighting form our preliminary task made it difficult to see the action and what was happening. 
 Although this sometimes works in movies, in our task it looked like we hadn't payed attention to lighting and it didn't  look like a conscious choice. 


So in our preliminary task we changes this so every thing was much brighter and visible which worked really well. 

 In these shots the light has increased the view of what is happening. The light falls very well not the important parts such as the glass smashing and the glass in the sink. This works a lot better than the shadowy action from the preliminary task.

Sound
The sound in the two projects differs greatly. The sound we used in our preliminary task was very jovial and experimental which coupled with the sense of humour element worked well but we knew for our final product we had to be serious. I believe the serious music worked much better than the music from the preliminary task because it flowed better and really created the atmosphere. Also the music editing improved a lot, rather than small periods of silence where the music cut away too quickly we had music that flowed between tracks and promoted the feeling of the piece. In our final product we also paid more attention to the difference between diegetic and non-diegetic sound. We enhanced the diegetic sound of the glass so it is more shocking, in our preliminary task we didn't think about diegetic sound and only paid atention to non-diegetic. 

Continuity and Continuity Editing
Our continuity and continuity editing in our preliminary task wasn't bad but it wasn't as good as in our final project. The preliminary task had unrealistic continuity editing with the eye line match where the watch was too still and the continuity was slightly off with the costume not remaining the same throughout. This was definitely improved in our final project with the costume being the same everyday of filming and the props kept the same, even the sugar glass where we bought 3 identical glasses. 

 Here we can see the continuity going wrong. The character we see has his jacket open and his hair styled but in the next shot the jacket is done up and his hair is flat. This comes from filming on a few different days  and he couldn't keep the same clothes and forgot to style his hair. In the final product we made sure that we eliminated this kind of continuity error






Conclusion
Overall I believe that our final product was better because of the lighting, shot, shot length and the the camera positioning.These elements really added to the final product something that wasn't there in the preliminary task but the preliminary task was more adventurous with the graphic match which we would have been good to include in our final product.